Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Some Waldensians weren't strongly opposed to lying if necessary for survival. [20] Defenders of lying in some cases, such as Cassian and H. Tristram Engelhardt, tended to hold the opposite view: that sometimes true moral dilemmas arise. [21] Martin Luther argued that it is permissible to go as far as swearing an Oath in a lie in his commentary ...
Even in the cases where lying is acceptable, it is preferable to tell a technically true but deceptive statement or employ half-truth. It is also completely forbidden to lie habitually, to lie to a child (which would teach them that it was acceptable), and to lie in the court system.
The Kant scholar Allen W. Wood characterizes the essay as "famous (or infamous)". [3] Helga Varden has written, "Kant's example of lying to the murderer at the door has been a cherished source of scorn for thinkers with little sympathy for Kant's philosophy and a source of deep puzzlement for those more favorably inclined...
Telling the truth is the moral of this story. ... Most Christian philosophers might argue that lying is never acceptable, but that even those who are righteous in God ...
While lying isn’t 100 percent different, the two aren’t one in the same. “Lying is when someone makes an untrue statement, often with the intention to deceive someone else,” Dr. Lyons says.
Mental reservation (or mental equivocation) is an ethical theory and a doctrine in moral theology which recognizes the "lie of necessity", and holds that when there is a conflict between justice and telling the truth, it is justice that should prevail.
For example, someone who knows that lying is wrong but decides to lie anyway to improve their situation is acting immorally. #7 When I was in my early teens, my brother and I were shooting airsoft ...
The concept of universalizability was set out by the 18th-century German philosopher Immanuel Kant as part of his work Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals.It is part of the first formulation of his categorical imperative, which states that the only morally acceptable maxims of our actions are those that could rationally be willed to be universal law.