Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
The most general notion is the union of an arbitrary collection of sets, sometimes called an infinitary union. If M is a set or class whose elements are sets, then x is an element of the union of M if and only if there is at least one element A of M such that x is an element of A. [11] In symbols:
So, an element belonging to both A and B appears twice in the disjoint union, with two different labels. A disjoint union of an indexed family of sets (:) is a set , often denoted by , with an injection of each into , such that the images of these injections form a partition of (that is, each element of belongs to exactly one of these images).
This article lists mathematical properties and laws of sets, involving the set-theoretic operations of union, intersection, and complementation and the relations of set equality and set inclusion. It also provides systematic procedures for evaluating expressions, and performing calculations, involving these operations and relations.
The double-counted elements are those in the intersection of the two sets and the count is corrected by subtracting the size of the intersection. The inclusion-exclusion principle, being a generalization of the two-set case, is perhaps more clearly seen in the case of three sets, which for the sets A, B and C is given by
In mathematics, the symmetric difference of two sets, also known as the disjunctive union and set sum, is the set of elements which are in either of the sets, but not in their intersection. For example, the symmetric difference of the sets { 1 , 2 , 3 } {\displaystyle \{1,2,3\}} and { 3 , 4 } {\displaystyle \{3,4\}} is { 1 , 2 , 4 ...
In general, the join and meet of a subset of a partially ordered set need not exist. Join and meet are dual to one another with respect to order inversion. A partially ordered set in which all pairs have a join is a join-semilattice. Dually, a partially ordered set in which all pairs have a meet is a meet-semilattice.
The axiom of replacement allows one to form many unions, such as the union of two sets. However, in its full generality, the axiom of union is independent from the rest of the ZFC-axioms: [citation needed] Replacement does not prove the existence of the union of a set of sets if the result contains an unbounded number of cardinalities.
1. The difference of two sets: x~y is the set of elements of x not in y. 2. An equivalence relation \ The difference of two sets: x\y is the set of elements of x not in y. − The difference of two sets: x−y is the set of elements of x not in y. ≈ Has the same cardinality as × A product of sets / A quotient of a set by an equivalence ...