When.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Herring v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herring_v._United_States

    Ohio (1961), the Supreme Court created the exclusionary rule, which generally operates to suppress – i.e. prevent the introduction at trial of – evidence obtained in violation of Constitutional rights. "Suppression of evidence, however, has always been [the court's] last resort, not [its] first impulse.

  3. Murray v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murray_v._United_States

    Murray v. United States, 487 U.S. 533 (1988), was a United States Supreme Court decision that created the modern "independent source doctrine" exception to the exclusionary rule. The exclusionary rule makes most evidence gathered through violations of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution inadmissible in criminal trials as ...

  4. Exclusionary rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exclusionary_rule

    The exclusionary rule does not apply in a civil case, in a grand jury proceeding, or in a parole revocation hearing.. The law in force at the time of the police action, not the time of the attempt to introduce the evidence, controls whether the action is illegal for exclusionary rule purposes.

  5. United States v. Leon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Leon

    The Supreme Court announced its decision on July 5, 1984, with Justice Byron White filing for the 6–3 majority in favor of the United States, with Justice Harry Blackmun writing a concurring opinion. First, the exclusionary rule is designed to deter police misconduct rather than to punish magistrates and judges for their errors.

  6. Nix v. Williams - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Williams

    Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984), was a U.S. Supreme Court case that created an "inevitable discovery" exception to the exclusionary rule.The exclusionary rule makes most evidence gathered through violations of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure, inadmissible in criminal trials as "fruit of the poisonous tree".

  7. Should Supreme Court disqualify Trump from running ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-disqualify-trump...

    In a 126-page law review posted last month, they put a new focus on the Constitution’s response to the nation’s greatest insurrection and find significantly higher odds that the Supreme Court ...

  8. Judge James Ho Kicks Off The Auditions For Trump’s Next ...

    www.aol.com/judge-james-ho-kicks-off-235528417.html

    Ho’s legal logic rests on the landmark 1898 Supreme Court case of U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark that interpreted birthright citizenship as applying to those born on U.S. soil to noncitizens, no matter ...

  9. Independent source doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_source_doctrine

    In US law, the independent source doctrine is an exception to the exclusionary rule. [1] The doctrine applies to evidence initially discovered during, or as a consequence of, an unlawful search, but later obtained independently from activities untainted by the initial illegality. [2] The United States Supreme Court, in Nix v.