Search results
Results From The WOW.Com Content Network
Intel Core i9 (Extreme Edition) i9-7900X i9-7920X i9-7940X i9-7960X i9-7980XE Kaby Lake Cascade Lake: Q3 2017–present 2.90 GHz – 4.30 GHz LGA 2066: 14 nm 35 W – 165 W 8 - 18 (with hyperthreading) 8 GT/s 64 KiB per core 1 MiB per core 13.75 MiB – 24.75 MiB Yes Processor Series nomenclature Code name Production date Features supported ...
Processor family Model Cores Threads Clock rate (GHz) Cache (MB) IGP TDP (W) Codename Socket Release Base Max. turbo L1 L2 L3 Processor Clock rate (MHz) Base Max. dynamic Core i7: 8700K 6 12 3.70: 4.70 — — 12 UHD 630: 350: 1200 95 Coffee Lake: LGA 1151: Q4 2017 8700 6 12 3.20: 4.60 — — 12 UHD 630: 350: 1200 65 Q4 2017 8086K 6 12 4.00 ...
first x86 processor; initially a temporary substitute for the iAPX 432 to compete with Motorola, Zilog, and National Semiconductor and to top the successful Z80. The 8088 version, with an 8-bit bus, was used in the original IBM Personal Computer. 186 included a DMA controller, interrupt controller, timers, and chip select logic. A small number ...
The following is a comparison of CPU microarchitectures. Microarchitecture Year Pipeline stages Misc Elbrus-8S: 2014 VLIW, Elbrus (proprietary, closed) version 5, 64-bit
Other ratings, such as the ADP mix which does not include floating point operations, were produced for commercial applications. The thousand instructions per second (kIPS) unit is rarely used today, as most current microprocessors can execute at least a million instructions per second.
The Ivy Bridge-EP processor line announced in September 2013 has up to 12 cores and 30 MB third level cache, with rumors of Ivy Bridge-EX up to 15 cores and an increased third level cache of up to 37.5 MB, [45] [46] although an early leaked lineup of Ivy Bridge-E included processors with a maximum of 6 cores.
The majority of the desktop and mobile Core 2 processor variants are Core 2 Duo [25] [26] with two processor cores on a single Merom, Conroe, Allendale, Penryn, or Wolfdale chip. These come in a wide range of performance and power consumption, starting with the relatively slow ultra-low-power Uxxxx (10 W) and low-power Lxxxx (17 W) versions, to ...
System designers building parallel computers, such as Google's hardware, pick CPUs based on their performance per watt of power, because the cost of powering the CPU outweighs the cost of the CPU itself. [2] Spaceflight computers have hard limits on the maximum power available and also have hard requirements on minimum real-time performance.